<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the topic "QRecall & VMware Fusion snapshots"]]></title>
		<link>https://forums.qrecall.com/posts/list/6.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the topic "QRecall & VMware Fusion snapshots"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>QRecall &amp; VMware Fusion snapshots</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Not sure exactly of the extent of the issue but both products (QRecall &amp; VMware Fusion using snapshots) don't seem to be friendly to each other. Capturing a VM with active snapshots just hangs my system (10.10 + Fusion 8.1). A simple exclusion takes care of this but just wanted to mention it.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.qrecall.com/posts/preList/582/2740.page</guid>
				<link>https://forums.qrecall.com/posts/preList/582/2740.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 21 Feb 2016 01:25:08]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Alexandre Takacs]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:QRecall &amp; VMware Fusion snapshots</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I've never heard of anyone complaining that QRecall and VMware don't play nicely—and I have quite a few VMware users. <br> <br>First, make sure you're using QRecall 2.0 (currently in [url=http://www.qrecall.com/download/]beta[/url], but close to a final release). If your still running into problems, send a diagnostic report.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.qrecall.com/posts/preList/582/2742.page</guid>
				<link>https://forums.qrecall.com/posts/preList/582/2742.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 21 Feb 2016 09:19:29]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ James Bucanek]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:QRecall &amp; VMware Fusion snapshots</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Running latest versions of OSX, QRecall and VmWare Fusion. <br> <br>I am still seeing some issues with backing up running VMs. <br> <br>[list]If said VMs have active snapshots, the backup time increases hugely, with the machine crawling to the verge of being completely unusable[/list] <br>[list]I also see that QRecall spends an inordinate amount of time trying to backup vmware lck files (I guess I should exclude them, but not sure how to proceeded with files within a package) <br> <br>[img]http://i.imgur.com/MqbUrA3.jpg[/img][/list] <br> <br>Any suggestion most welcome]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.qrecall.com/posts/preList/582/2817.page</guid>
				<link>https://forums.qrecall.com/posts/preList/582/2817.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 5 Jun 2016 21:18:35]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Alexandre Takacs]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:QRecall &amp; VMware Fusion snapshots</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ If your snapshot files (which tend to be large) are slowing things down a lot, you might want to check your shifted-quanta capture setting (Archive &gt; Settings...). Shifted-quanta detection will not be beneficial for either disk image or memory images files. So for VMWare, it should be set to its lowest setting or just turned off. <br> <br>If that doesn't help, there are additional things to try. <br> <br>It's also unlikely that QRecall is spending a lot if time capturing .lck files. These tend to be very small semaphore files. It's more likely that a .lck file was just the last thing it captured while looking for the next thing to capture.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.qrecall.com/posts/preList/582/2818.page</guid>
				<link>https://forums.qrecall.com/posts/preList/582/2818.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 5 Jun 2016 22:04:00]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ James Bucanek]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>