|
Register /
Login
|
Desktop view
|
I think it's a great idea. It's been on the future features list for a while now.David Stevens wrote:I'd still like t know what you think about monitoring specific groups of files for saved changes as a capture criteria.
Actually, capturing items while the application is active is the most problematic time to do so. Documents are often "in flux" or only partially written and capturing them at that point in time results in an invalid or incomplete copy of the actual document data.David Stevens wrote:Another way to do it would be to have a particular action "turn on" only when the programme that creates the files is active and/or "in front", as you're only going to want to back up changes when you're working on something. Would that be an easier way to do this
James Bucanek wrote:David Stevens wrote:
Applications that write out the entire document at once (like most word processors and graphics applications) are safe to capture once written and would be best served by monitoring a folder for new items.
Ok, that makes sense. I used to have a program that did this, and it saved my bacon after I'd made some changes to a software patch that totally broke the thing. Unfortunately, that particular app had a number of issues (it crashed every time I closed down the computer for one), so I don't use it any more. It'll be nice to be able to do this with QRecall.
thanks
David