![]() |
Register /
Login
|
Desktop view
|
Filename | QRecall-20080701.log.zip |
Description | No description given |
Filesize | 3 Kbytes |
Downloaded | 947 time(s) |
![]() |
Rodd Zurcher wrote:Only question I have (and I don't think it's beta related) is how long it takes a capture to "locate free space".
I'm backing up two machines to the same archive. At first I thought the locating was fast when the same machine captured to the archive without the other in between (Capture A, Capture A; not Capture A, Capture B, Capture A).
But I think an intervening Merge/Compact has more impact; but I'm not sure.
How long this takes depends primarily on the total number of items records in the archive and fast it can read them. Reading millions of file records over a WiFi connection will take awhile.I'm backing up to an archive over AFS. Using both ethernet and WiFi. Of course the wifi is slower; but works.
That's exactly what it is doing. It's "locating" the unused data so it can add it to the index of free space.Is there anyway you could index the free space instead of "locating" it?
That's a good idea. I'll add some message indicating how long it took to locate the free space. I might even be able to log the amount of free space it found. The timing of scribble files, however, is somewhat meaningless as this happens in parallel with the capture. It's only an issue if the capture finished before the initial copy does.Also could you add to the log the amount of time spent creating the scribbles, and locating the free space (to the normal logs; not #debug).